Vulva

9 structured phenotype dimensions · drawn from peer-reviewed scales

Vulva — Vagina phenotype reference across ethnic populations

Vagina

General Description: The vagina is a muscular and tubular part of the female genital tract. It extends from the vulva to the cervix and is the pathway for menstrual flow, sexual intercourse, and childbirth.

Ethnic Variations: While the internal structure of the vagina is relatively consistent across different ethnic groups, external aspects like the vulva can vary in terms of size, color, and general appearance. These variations are normal and part of the broader diversity of human bodies.

Cultural Significance: The vagina is often a subject of cultural and social significance, with various perceptions and attitudes surrounding it in different societies. It's important to approach this topic with respect and sensitivity.

AI Character Design Considerations: When designing AI characters, representing anatomical accuracy is important. However, the portrayal should be handled respectfully and appropriately, considering the diverse nature of the audience and cultural sensitivities.

Vulva — taxonomy

9 dimensions · 0 photo-assessable · v1.0.0 · UBERON: UBERON:0000997

Schema-only: this taxonomy is published academically, but observations from public-domain photographs are not populated. Source-cleared internal data only.

External female genital anatomy: mons pubis, labia majora, labia minora, clitoral hood, perineum. Dimensions are drawn from aesthetic-gynecology and plastic-surgery literature (Hodgkinson, Motakef, Felicio, Lloyd) and from the Lloyd 2005 study of female genital morphological variation. The schema is published in the canonical vocabulary for academic transparency and ontology interoperability; **observations against these dimensions are not populated from public-domain photographs**, are not exported to the HuggingFace dataset, and any data collection requires explicit consent and source documentation. See the `observations_source_policy: "internal_only"` file-level flag and the README's two-layer extension model.

Dimensions

  • Labia majora — size

    not from photo

    ordinal · labia_majora_size_qualitative

    Relative size of the labia majora envelope from the mons pubis to the perineum.

    Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CL, Liao LM, Creighton SM (2005). Female genital appearance: 'normality' unfolds. BJOG, 112(5): 643-646.

    Valid values (3)

    • small_atrophicSmall / atrophicLimited subcutaneous fullness; minimal coverage of underlying structures. Common with low body-fat percentage and after menopause.
    • moderateModerateAverage labia majora fullness.
    • fullFullPronounced subcutaneous fullness; substantial coverage of underlying structures.
  • Labia majora — pigmentation

    not from photo

    ordinal · labial_pigmentation_qualitative

    Pigmentation of the labia majora relative to surrounding pubic / inner-thigh skin.

    Pigmentation differential common in dermatology and aesthetic-gynecology literature; aligned with the descriptors used in Hauben & Mahler 1983-style relative-pigmentation analysis.

    Valid values (3)

    • matches_surroundingMatches surrounding skinLabial pigmentation similar to surrounding pubic skin.
    • moderately_darkerModerately darkerVisible darkening of labial skin relative to surrounding.
    • markedly_darkerMarkedly darkerStrongly pigmented labia substantially darker than surrounding skin. Constitutional in some populations; also age- and hormone-related.
  • Labia minora — protrusion

    not from photo

    categorical · motakef_2015

    Position of the labia minora edge relative to the labia majora edge. The Motakef simplified classification is the contemporary standard.

    Motakef S, Rodriguez-Feliz J, Chung MT, Ingargiola MJ, Wong VW, Patel A (2015). Vaginal labiaplasty: current practices and a simplified classification system for labial protrusion. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 135(3): 774-788.

    Valid values (4)

    • class_1_no_protrusionClass I — no protrusionLabia minora contained entirely within the labia majora; not visible at rest with legs together.
    • class_2_protrusion_under_3cmClass II — protrusion <3 cmLabia minora protrude beyond the labia majora by less than approximately 3 cm.
    • class_3_protrusion_over_3cmClass III — protrusion ≥3 cmLabia minora protrude beyond the labia majora by approximately 3 cm or more.
    • asymmetricAsymmetricNotable left-right protrusion difference as the dominant feature.
  • Labia minora — morphology

    not from photo

    categorical · labia_minora_shape_qualitative

    Edge morphology and contour of the labia minora.

    Aesthetic-gynecology shape descriptors aligned with Felicio (1992) and subsequent classification literature.

    Valid values (4)

    • smooth_edgedSmooth-edgedEven, smooth labial edges without significant ruffling or scalloping.
    • ruffledRuffled / scallopedVisible scalloping or rippling along the labial edge.
    • thickenedThickenedVisibly thicker labial tissue along the edge.
    • thin_attenuatedThin / attenuatedReduced labial tissue thickness.
  • Labial symmetry

    not from photo

    ordinal · labial_symmetry_qualitative

    Degree of left-right labial symmetry. Substantial constitutional asymmetry is common; this dimension captures the visible degree.

    Aligned with surgical-gynecology symmetry descriptors.

    Valid values (4)

    • symmetricSymmetricNo discernible left-right asymmetry.
    • mild_asymmetryMild asymmetrySubtle left-right size or shape difference.
    • moderate_asymmetryModerate asymmetryClearly visible left-right difference.
    • marked_asymmetryMarked asymmetrySubstantial left-right divergence; one side notably larger or differently shaped.
  • Clitoral hood morphology

    not from photo

    categorical · clitoral_hood_qualitative

    Coverage of the clitoral glans by the prepuce (clitoral hood).

    Aesthetic-gynecology descriptors; aligned with the Hodgkinson tradition and subsequent labiaplasty / hoodoplasty literature.

    Valid values (4)

    • coveredCoveredGlans fully concealed by prepuce at rest.
    • partial_exposurePartially exposedGlans partially visible at rest; prepuce covers a portion.
    • fully_exposedFully exposedGlans visible at rest; minimal prepuce coverage.
    • redundant_hoodedRedundant / hoodedPronounced prepuce with excess folds; multiple visible folds laterally.
  • Mons pubis prominence

    not from photo

    ordinal · mons_prominence_qualitative

    Anterior projection of the mons pubis from the pubic bone, primarily a function of subcutaneous fat.

    Aligned with body-contouring and abdominoplasty literature on suprapubic / mons-pubis fullness.

    Valid values (3)

    • flatFlatMinimal subcutaneous fullness; pubic bone palpable just under skin.
    • moderateModerateAverage mons pubis prominence.
    • prominentProminentSubstantial subcutaneous fullness; pronounced anterior projection. Common with elevated BMI.
  • Perineal distance

    not from photo

    ordinal · perineal_body_qualitative

    Distance from posterior fourchette to anterior anal margin (perineal body length).

    Aligned with obstetric and pelvic-floor literature on perineal-body length (PBL).

    Valid values (3)

    • shortShortPerineal body shorter than approximately 2.5 cm.
    • normalNormalPerineal body approximately 2.5-4 cm.
    • longLongPerineal body longer than approximately 4 cm.
  • Introitus visibility at rest

    not from photo

    ordinal · introitus_visibility_qualitative

    Visibility of the vaginal introitus at rest, a function of labial size and protrusion together.

    Aligned with pelvic-anatomy descriptors used in obstetric / aesthetic-gynecology literature on labial morphology.

    Valid values (3)

    • concealedConcealedIntroitus not visible at rest with legs together; fully covered by labia.
    • partial_visiblePartially visibleIntroitus partially visible; labia minora separated or short.
    • exposedExposedIntroitus visible at rest; minimal labial coverage.
References (5)
  1. Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CL, Liao LM, Creighton SM (2005). Female genital appearance: 'normality' unfolds. BJOG, 112(5): 643-646.
  2. Motakef S, Rodriguez-Feliz J, Chung MT, Ingargiola MJ, Wong VW, Patel A (2015). Vaginal labiaplasty: current practices and a simplified classification system for labial protrusion. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 135(3): 774-788.
  3. Hodgkinson DJ, Hait G (1984). Aesthetic vaginal labioplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 74(3): 414-416.
  4. Felicio Y de A (1992). Labial surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 27(3).
  5. Hauben DJ, Mahler D (1983). A reappraisal of the importance of areolar pigmentation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 71(6).

Top-coverage ethnic groups

Groups with the most image-grounded phenotype data — sorted by Data Depth score

Other phenotype categories